Category: Uncategorized

The serpent said “you shall be like god”
But the universe doesn’t bow to me
My biggest idol is me
Words fly that are meaningless strings of vulgar
Because the universe doesn’t bow
And still it doesn’t bow
But He bowed
“Thy will be done”
And so it was
And so am I
Not God
But son

Though we did not exist in substance before conception, Scripture teaches that we were known and purposed by God before we were formed. This does not imply a preexistent soul but affirms that each person is uniquely created according to God’s eternal plan.

As Jeremiah 1:5 says, “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,” and Psalm 139 speaks of God knitting us together with care. This “knowing” is not merely intellectual—it reflects God’s relational and intentional love.

Like a person who envisions a scarf before they begin knitting it—knowing its shape, design, and purpose—God held each of us in His mind and heart before we were ever formed.

We were not accidents of biology, but acts of divine intention. This truth magnifies both the sovereignty of God and the value of every human life.

That means you 🙂

Imagine a train, gleaming with promise, barreling toward a cleaner, greener future. Its cars are stacked with wind turbines, solar panels, and electric vehicles—each one sold as a symbol of salvation in a warming world. But as the smoke clears, an unsettling question lingers: who’s actually at the controls—and where is this train really going?

What’s marketed as a noble climate movement starts to shimmer like a mirage when you peer beneath the surface. Let’s walk the tracks and take a closer look.

The Cracks in the Green Shine

I started asking questions when the story stopped adding up.

Take wind turbines—those towering icons of green energy. Their blades are made using 500 to 1,000 gallons of oil-based resins per unit [1]. Solar panels? Most are produced in China’s coal-fueled factories, with projected global panel waste reaching 78 million tons by 2050 [2]. Electric vehicles (EVs), often labeled “zero emission,” require batteries whose production emits 10–20 tons of CO₂ [3]—equivalent to driving a gasoline car for about two years. And that’s before a single charge, often drawn from fossil-fueled grids.

Far from clean, these technologies lean heavily on fossil fuels—especially in China, which manufactures about 70% of the world’s solar panels, wind turbines, and EV batteries [4], while contributing nearly 28% of global CO₂ emissions [5]. If these “solutions” are so intertwined with the very problems they claim to solve, isn’t it fair to ask whether we’ve been sold a mirage?

Selective Outrage—and Selective Accountability

We hear a lot about U.S. and European emissions, yet the spotlight rarely lingers on Brazil, where Amazon deforestation releases 1.5 to 2.9 gigatons of CO₂ annually [6], or China, whose emissions dwarf the rest of the world in absolute terms. While Western gas-powered cars are vilified, China’s mass production of “green” tech—subsidized, coal-powered, and often environmentally opaque—gets a pass.

Brazil’s soy and beef exports feed global biofuel and agriculture markets, but the finger still points at American SUVs. It’s like scolding the kids for crumbs while the bakery burns down behind you.

And let’s not forget: much of the global demand for EVs and solar panels has been turbocharged by state subsidies and market dumping from Chinese manufacturers—not solely by grassroots consumer demand [7].

Science Isn’t Settled—And That’s the Point

By definition, science is not “settled.” It studies, tests, refines—and sometimes overturns—what we thought we knew. And that’s exactly why debate, dissent, and fresh evidence matter.

Temperature records are sometimes skewed by urban heat island effects, which some estimates suggest may inflate localized warming by 0.01 to 0.1°C [8]. Natural climate drivers, like solar cycles and oceanic shifts, play a measurable role—albeit smaller than anthropogenic CO₂—yet they’re often left out of public-facing models.

Let’s be clear: no one is denying climate changes. The historical record—from the Medieval Warm Period to the Little Ice Age—shows that climate has always shifted, often dramatically, and shaped entire civilizations (e.g., the Norman conquest following agrarian shifts). The real question is: do those in charge actually believe in anthropogenic climate change? Because if they did, wouldn’t they be more urgently focused on the contradictions outlined here?

Who’s Really Driving This Train?

It’s not just activists or concerned citizens onboard. At the engine is China—manufacturing the bulk of global green tech while tightening its grip on rare earth supply chains. With over $100 billion in green tech exports and a commanding share of critical materials, China’s industrial strategy is arguably the single most influential force in global climate economics [9].

But they’re not alone in the engine room.

• Tesla profits handsomely from global subsidies and Chinese supply chains [10].
• Western governments push green spending tied to elections and global agreements.
• NGOs like WWF, with budgets topping $400 million, advocate loudly—yet often align with corporate or state-backed interests [11].
• Multinationals and investors chase ESG scores, subsidies, and PR wins.

This isn’t about conspiracy—it’s about aligned incentives. Power, money, and control are often cloaked in green language. And that’s worth talking about.

So What’s the Point?

This isn’t a call to dismiss climate concerns. It’s a call to cut through the noise.

If we’re serious about addressing climate change:

• Demand full-cost accounting—including coal use, supply chain waste, and displacement effects.
• Scrutinize who benefits from each policy and product.
• Prioritize practical solutions like nuclear energy, reforestation, and land stewardship, not just politically convenient technologies.

The green train is real—but it’s not always headed where we think. If we want truth—not just slogans—we need to ask harder questions, and maybe even pull the emergency brake.

Your move: Share this post, talk with your friends, ask your local reps the hard questions, and let’s steer the conversation toward clarity—not just compliance.

---

References

1. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) – Life Cycle Analysis of Wind Turbines
2. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), “End-of-Life Management: Solar Photovoltaic Panels,” 2016
3. Volvo & IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, 2017; updated 2020
4. IEA – “Clean Energy Manufacturing” report, 2023
5. Global Carbon Atlas, 2023 CO₂ Emissions by Country
6. Global Forest Watch / World Resources Institute
7. Bloomberg – “China’s EV Subsidies and Global Pricing Power,” 2022
8. IPCC AR6 & UHI Impact Papers (e.g., Oke, 2004; McKitrick & Michaels, 2007)
9. World Bank – “Critical Minerals for Energy Transition,” 2023
10. Reuters – “Tesla’s Supply Chain Ties to China’s Xinjiang Region,” 2022
11. WWF Financial Reports, 2022

When the Front Line Knows Best: Lessons in Leadership from History and Experience

In the quiet moments between meetings and the hum of daily tasks, I often find myself reflecting on the stories history tells us—not just of events, but of decisions made, voices heard or ignored, and the ripples that followed.

One such story is that of General Charles Gordon in 1885. Stationed in Khartoum, he faced mounting threats and sent urgent pleas for reinforcements. His superiors, distant from the immediacy of the situation, delayed action. By the time help arrived, it was too late. Khartoum had fallen, and with it, a lesson etched into the annals of leadership: the cost of not listening to those on the ground.

Fast forward to 1994, Rwanda. General Roméo Dallaire, leading the UN peacekeeping forces, foresaw the impending genocide and sought permission to act decisively. Bureaucratic hesitations and a lack of understanding of the situation’s gravity led to inaction. The result was a tragic loss of life that perhaps could have been mitigated had the warnings from the field been heeded.

These aren’t just historical footnotes; they’re reminders. In our organizations, communities, and personal lives, the voices closest to the action often hold insights that distant oversight can’t replicate.

Consider the Allied invasion of Normandy during World War II. Supreme Commander Dwight D. Eisenhower made the pivotal decision to delay the operation based on weather reports and intelligence from those directly involved. This choice, informed by frontline insights, contributed significantly to the mission’s success.

Similarly, during the Apollo 13 mission crisis, NASA’s leadership placed trust in the engineers and astronauts facing the immediate challenges. Their collaborative problem-solving, grounded in firsthand experience, brought the crew home safely.

On the other hand, the Challenger shuttle disaster in 1986 offers a sobering counterpoint. Engineers at Morton Thiokol warned NASA that the O-rings in the shuttle’s boosters could fail in the freezing temperatures expected on launch day. These warnings were overridden by leadership under pressure to stay on schedule. The result was catastrophic: the shuttle disintegrated 73 seconds after liftoff, killing all seven astronauts aboard. It remains one of the most tragic examples of leadership choosing optics over listening.

And then there are moments when listening to those on the front lines made the difference between life and death—literally. On September 11, 2001, as chaos unfolded in Lower Manhattan, many fire chiefs and unit commanders made rapid decisions on the ground to evacuate and reposition personnel. Some of these calls, made without waiting for centralized direction, saved lives. Their instinct, forged in experience and proximity to danger, cut through the fog of confusion in ways top-down command never could.

These narratives converge on a singular truth: effective leadership isn’t about commanding from a distance but about engaging with, listening to, and valuing the perspectives of those immersed in the realities of the situation.

In our daily endeavors, whether leading a team, participating in community projects, or navigating personal relationships, let’s remember the importance of proximity—not just in presence but in understanding. By tuning into the voices on the front lines, we not only make informed decisions but also foster a culture of trust and collaboration.

After all, history has shown us that when leaders listen, truly listen, to those they lead, the outcomes can be profoundly positive.

Music has a way of grounding us—of telling stories that feel both deeply personal and universally understood. That’s exactly what Common Man does so well. Hailing from Huntsville, Alabama, the band blends folk, country, and gospel influences into something both timeless and refreshingly honest.

On Sunday, March 16, at 5:00 PM, Common Man will take the stage at Fort Worth Presbyterian Church to open the 2025 Bluebonnet Sessions, a five-part concert series focused on authentic, moving performances in an intimate setting.

Common Man’s music speaks to life’s ordinary moments—the struggles, the grace, the humor—wrapped in rich harmonies and thoughtful songwriting. Their sound feels like an old friend, familiar yet full of surprises, and their live performances create a space where connection and reflection feel natural.

The Bluebonnet Sessions aims to bring together musicians who capture that same spirit, offering a place to slow down and really listen. Whether you’re a longtime fan of the band or just looking for something real, this will be an evening worth experiencing.

For those interested in attending, details can be found at riffmore.com.

Cheers,
Dowell

riffmore/blog

It begins with an open door and smile that says “Come in, make yourself at home, there’s a space for you here”. You pushed the coffee table to the side, lined up mismatched chairs, rearranged the lighting and your home feels like it’s been meant for something like this, a night when music and people find each other in the same place.

A house concert is a kind of beautiful that sneaks up on you. Like how the sky slowly turns pink just before sunset. Like how the best conversations seem to happen after everyone’s forgotten to check the time. So the evening unfolds gently, without barriers— no stage separating the musician from those gathered. Songs are shared like stories passed between neighbors over a fence. Listeners, seated close and unguarded, receive the music as one receives rain after a dry season—welcoming it deeply, as if it were rain after a long drought, needed more than anyone realized.

And when the songs end, there is no rush to leave. People linger—lingering being as much a part of the experience as the music itself. Conversations arise that might not happen elsewhere—conversations about life, faith, joy, and struggle. In those moments, it becomes clear that the concert was never about the music alone, but about what the music allowed: the weaving together of lives, however briefly, in a spirit of kindness and shared experience.

A house concert isn’t just an event; it’s a seedbed for community. It’s the creation of something beyond music—a place where art touches life and where people remember the joy of being together. Hosting one isn’t just about the evening itself; it’s about opening doors to a longer, deeper story—one where music becomes the thread that binds us all together.

And for those who attend, they don’t leave with a memory of having seen a band. They leave with the sense of having been part of something greater—a moment in time when songs became more than sound, and strangers became companions.

Host&Artist is more than a web site, it is a opportunity to be part of a thousand moments of creation.

https://hostandartist.com/

The Correlation Between Christian Church Attendance and Overall Happiness, Low Crime, and Low Family Dysfunction

Proverbs 13:20 “Whoever walks with the wise becomes wise, but the companion of fools will suffer harm”

Introduction

The role of religion in shaping individual behavior and societal norms has been a subject of interest for centuries. Christian church attendance, in particular, has been linked to various positive social outcomes, including increased happiness, lower crime rates, and reduced family dysfunction. This paper explores these correlations and examines the underlying factors contributing to these associations.

Church Attendance and Overall Happiness

Research consistently shows a positive correlation between regular church attendance and higher levels of happiness and life satisfaction. A study by Lim and Putnam (2010) found that individuals who attend religious services regularly report higher levels of happiness compared to those who do not attend or attend less frequently. The sense of community, shared values, and support systems provided by religious congregations contribute significantly to this heightened sense of well-being (Lim & Putnam, 2010).

Religious teachings often emphasize gratitude, forgiveness, and hope, which can enhance an individual’s outlook on life. Furthermore, churchgoers often engage in altruistic behaviors, such as volunteering and charitable giving, which are linked to increased personal happiness (Krause, 2009).

Church Attendance and Crime Rates

Several studies suggest that higher church attendance is associated with lower crime rates. Johnson, De Li, Larson, and McCullough (2000) conducted a comprehensive review of empirical research and concluded that religious involvement is inversely related to criminal behavior. The moral teachings and ethical frameworks provided by religious institutions play a crucial role in shaping individuals’ behavior and deterring criminal activities.

Churches often promote prosocial behavior and provide moral guidance that discourages actions harmful to society. Additionally, religious communities offer social support and monitoring, which can reduce the likelihood of engaging in criminal activities (Baier & Wright, 2001).

Church Attendance and Family Dysfunction

Family dysfunction, characterized by conflict, instability, and lack of cohesion, is another area where church attendance appears to have a positive impact. Studies indicate that families who regularly participate in religious activities exhibit lower levels of dysfunction. Mahoney, Pargament, Tarakeshwar, and Swank (2001) found that religious involvement promotes family stability and enhances marital satisfaction.

Religious teachings often emphasize the importance of family values, marital fidelity, and parenting responsibilities. These teachings, combined with the support networks provided by religious communities, contribute to healthier family dynamics. Additionally, religious activities often involve family participation, fostering stronger family bonds and communication (Mahoney et al., 2001).

Conclusion

The correlation between Christian church attendance and positive social outcomes, such as increased happiness, lower crime rates, and reduced family dysfunction, is supported by a substantial body of research. The sense of community, moral guidance, and support systems provided by religious institutions play pivotal roles in these associations. While further research is needed to understand the causal mechanisms fully, the existing evidence underscores the significant impact of religious involvement on individual and societal well-being.

References

• Baier, C. J., & Wright, B. R. E. (2001). “If You Love Me, Keep My Commandments”: A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Religion on Crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(1), 3-21.
• Johnson, B. R., De Li, S., Larson, D. B., & McCullough, M. (2000). A Systematic Review of the Religiosity and Delinquency Literature: A Research Note. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 16(1), 32-52.
• Krause, N. (2009). Religious Involvement, Gratitude, and Change in Depressive Symptoms Over Time. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19(3), 155-172.
• Lim, C., & Putnam, R. D. (2010). Religion, Social Networks, and Life Satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 914-933.
• Mahoney, A., Pargament, K. I., Tarakeshwar, N., & Swank, A. B. (2001). Religion in the Home in the 1980s and 1990s: A Meta-Analytic Review and Conceptual Analysis of Links Between Religion, Marriage, and Parenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 15(4), 559-596.

Walking into the house was like walking into a bakery. The smell of fresh baking cookies was fantastic! Moving into the kitchen as a fresh batch was being taken out of the oven added to the sensation. The cookies looked amazing. Perfect golden brown with melted chocolate chips perfectly showing their chocolaty goodness. It was a sensory overload.

Standing there, smelling the cookies, seeing them being shuffled from the cookie sheet to the cooling rack was delightful, however, no cookies were offered for tasting.

Another batch of cookie dough was being put on cookie sheets, ready to be placed in the oven. And still, no offer was made to taste those delicious-looking, and smelling morsels on the cooling rack.

It is a good thing to live our lives as a living sacrifice to our God and Savior Jesus Christ. It is, according to scripture, a requirement of the Christian. God is glorified when others see Christian love in progress and are exposed to the goodness of Christ. However, if we never offer others to taste and see that the Lord is good, I can tell you, from first-hand experience it is not a good thing. As it turns out the home baker in the story, not expecting guests and making just enough cookies for a commitment,, had warned her family not to take any cookies or offer any to others.

Hardly anything else is remembered from that day, not even who the family or the baker was. However, the effect of smelling and seeing without being offered is indelibly etched in my memory.

Let’s not leave others smelling and seeing without offering the goodness and grace of God. Let us be ready to give reason for the hope within us. Let us be courageous enough to offer the gospel while being aware enough to know when and how while being ever mindful that it is the Holy Spirit who stirs the heart and mind.

It actually was a dark and stormy night.  All across North Texas storm warnings were going out, and the veracity of this storm was expected to be among the highest levels seen in a very long time.  Some folks were hunkered down, as was being suggested, in closets with radios, water, and flashlights.

The forecasters were not wrong, the storm was ferocious.  Gusts of up to 70 miles per hour and numerous tornados wreaked havoc as the storm moved with amazing speed out of the west.  As the storm bore down on one home a lightning bolt let fly and struck the home.  So violent was the strike that it shook the ground and shook houses hundreds of yards away.  But the violence wasn’t limited to sound and motion, the bolt of lightning started a fire.

The home’s owners, alerted by the aforementioned sound and motion, and warned by smoke hastened to refuge with a neighbor.  There they watched as flames first began to appear in one corner of their home.  A home they had moved into less than a year and a half earlier.  Their home in which they had, with loving care, placed memories and mementos, treasures, and trinkets.  Their home, which had welcomed so many others was now foreboding as fire was seen through the pouring rain.  As lightning flashes revealed smoke pouring out of their home.

Firetrucks began to arrive, first one, then two, then 10, then more.  Brave men battling the blaze as the storm’s wind fed oxygen into the house, now a raging inferno.  In less than an hour, all was lost.  All memories, all mementos, all treasures, all trinkets, all of the love and care and struggle that went into the building of the home, lost as their home became just a burned-out hulk.

The next morning the firemen were still there dowsing the smoldering ruins.  Large machines moved into what once was their home to tear down the walls and expose any lingering elements of the fire—crashing walls, water, and foam.

And then, all was quiet.  The fires were gone, the firemen were gone, the home was gone, only the ruins remained.

       Be merciful to me, O God, be merciful to me,
for in you my soul takes refuge;
in the shadow of your wings I will take refuge,
till the storms of destruction pass by.
I cry out to God Most High,
to God who fulfills his purpose for me.
He will send from heaven and save me;
he will put to shame him who tramples on me. Selah
God will send out his steadfast love and his faithfulness!

        Psalm 57:1-3